Lets rebel, I ask this of you!
Let’s all sign a petition that abolishes the “CC suntan” (“CC” does not stand for Coco Chanel, but for Carlo Conti … do you know who he is?!)
I can’t bear it anylonger!
Whether it be summer or winter, whether it be -10 or +40 degrees, the avid followers of the glowing suntan, which quite honestly looks more like a chocolate snack (or a burnt pork), show a skin which has been excessively exposed to the sun, with a great deal of pride.
Enough! It has become an obsession!
It’s Ok to catch the sun, but in the right “doses”.
If it is true that the “CC suntan” is really “out”, then it is also true that there are few women (oh dear) that can boast such a clean and pale complexion like Dita Von Teese; therefore a suntan can be an easy escape to hide the forever looming bags under ones eyes, it can give us a healthy glow, momentarily eliminating (unfortunately) the grey deadly look which afflicts us throughout most of the year.
Ok, so let’s “feed” off the sun rays, but in the correct manner, respecting our phototype and hence using the correct sun lotions.
Therefore, in addition to avoiding serious skin pathologies and those forever scary wrinkles, we can be “safe” and we will no longer be subjected to the “Conti suntan”.
As far as the chronic fake tan fans go, what can I say?!
If you really can’t go on without the 300 yearly sunbed sessions which you undergo regularly, well…atleast try and be coherent!
Please, try to avoid flaunting your burnt skin when the temperatures hit -20° and when you’re wearing woolly hats.
It really is ridiculous!
The “trick”, like in all things, is not to be excessive; it is necessary to simply find “the correct doses of the ingredients” to give life to the perfect mix…